In the realm of language highlights, why do the yearly dictionary picks tend to lack vibrancy and relevance? The most recent additions such as “rage bait,” “parasocial,” and “vibe coding” seem like a fusion of words borrowed from a TikTok influencer by an office enthusiast trying to capture the current spirit, which falls short.
If a defining phrase for this challenging year in the English language were sought, “Trump grovelling” would likely top the list. These words, presumably uttered frequently in 2025, reflect the discomfort caused by the continuous acts of submission to him since his inauguration. His cabinet gatherings resembled televised medieval courts, demanding adoration akin to North Korean standards to earn his favor.
Not only did Americans engage in nauseating displays, but international figures also stooped to new lows. Benjamin Netanyahu lauded Trump after an Iran bombing, while Fifa’s Gianni Infantino proposed a peace prize for him. Even notable figures like Nato General Secretary Mark Rutte and Keir Starmer resorted to flattery, willing to be subservient to Trump.
As the year nears its end, a glimmer of hope emerges from an unexpected source – the BBC. Trump’s audacious demand for a substantial fine against the broadcaster for alleged misrepresentation should be met with a strong response. The BBC should counter-sue, challenging Trump’s claims of manipulation in a bid to protect its integrity.
Critics speculate that Trump is distorting the BBC’s mistake to divert attention from other issues, including the Epstein files and the nation’s declining economy. The BBC should take a firm stance by putting Trump on the witness stand and scrutinizing his actions on that fateful day, especially as the House of Representatives has formally accused him of serious offenses.
It is time for the BBC to exhibit courage and pursue legal action. If financial support is needed, a crowdfunder could be initiated, emphasizing the importance of standing firm against Trump’s demands for unwavering loyalty.